Follow @CIACsports on Twitter Like CIAC on Facebook
CIACsports.com Home Schedules About CIAC/Contact Staff Text Message and E-Mail Updates Online Championship Tickets Customizable CIAC Tournament Merchandise Tournament Brackets, Schedules, Rosters, Info and More!!!

2002 CLASS M BOYS BASKETBALL

First Round Second Round Quarterfinal Semifinal Final
1
32
Sacred Heart
Bye
  bracket Sacred Heart
Cheney Tech
62
41
bracket Sacred Heart
RHAM
84
67
bracket Sacred Heart
Trinity Catholic
56
70
bracket Trinity Catholic
N.W. Catholic
43
45
16
17
Cheney Tech
Goodwin Tech
61
52
8
25
RHAM
Abbott Tech
97
49
bracket RHAM
Immaculate
64
50
9
24
Immaculate
Kennedy
75
40
4
29
Trinity Catholic
Wilcox Tech
83
32
bracket Trinity Catholic
New London
73
41
bracket Trinity Catholic
Plainfield
61
54
13
20
New London
Joel Barlow
71
67
5
28
Bullard Havens
Plainville
62
47
bracket Bullard Havens
Plainfield
46
59 (OT)
12
21
Plainfield
Morgan
56
55
2
31
Kolbe Cathedral
Bye
  bracket Kolbe Cathedral
Haddam-Killingworth
80
61
bracket Kolbe Cathedral
Suffield
72
51
bracket Kolbe Cathedral
N.W. Catholic
63
64
15
18
Haddam-Killingworth
O'Brien Tech
50
47
7
26
Suffield
Windham Tech
106
47
bracket Suffield
Prince Tech
85
54
10
23
Prince Tech
Crosby
76
65
3
30
Kaynor Tech
Bye
  bracket Kaynor Tech
East Catholic
48
46
bracket Kaynor Tech
N.W. Catholic
45
63
14
19
East Catholic
New Fairfield
67
63
6
27
N.W. Catholic
Montville
62
42
bracket N.W. Catholic
Weston
67
39
11
22
Weston
Platt
58
42

 

RATINGS
SCHOOL/TOWN RATING PCT WON LOST POWER POINTS/
TIEBREAKER
Sacred Heart, Waterbury 1 1.000 20 0 3.0
Kolbe-Cathedral, Bridgeport 2 1.000 20 0 2.5
Kaynor Tech, Waterbury 3 1.000 20 0 2.3
Trinity, Stamford 4 .950 19 1  
Bullard Havens Tech, Bridgeport 5 .900 18 2 2.0
N.W. Catholic, W. Hartford 6 .900 18 2 1.9
Suffield 7 .900 18 2 1.45
RHAM, Hebron 8 .800 16 4  
Immaculate, Danbury 9 .750 15 5  
A.I. Prince Tech, Hartford 10 .737 14 5  
Weston 11 .700 14 6 1.75
Plainfield 12 .700 14 6 1.35
New London 13 .684 13 6  
East Catholic, Manchester 14 .650 13 7 1.55
Haddam-Killingworth, Higganum 15 .650 13 7 .70
Cheney Tech, Manchester 16 .600 12 8  
Goodwin Tech, New Britain 17 .579 11 8  
O'Brien Tech, Ansonia 18 .550 11 9  
New Fairfield 19 .500 10 10 1.4
Joel Barlow, Redding 20 .500 10 10 1.2
Morgan, Clinton 21 .500 10 10 .70
Platt, Meriden 22 .450 9 11 1.4
Crosby, Waterbury 23 .450 9 11 1.35
Kennedy, Waterbury 24 .450 9 11 1.30
Abbott Tech, Danbury 25 .450 9 11 .90
Windham Tech 26 .450 9 11 .75
Montville 27 .450 9 11 .65
Plainville 28 .400 8 12 .75 - 3/L
Wilcox Tech, Meriden 29 .400 8 12 1/L
 
Ranking / Seeding
(9.0 basketball tournament rules)
The rating of teams shall be determined by the percentage method: the number of games won divided by the number of games played. Ties in team ratings shall be decided by:
  1. Most Wins -- (ex. 10-10 higher than 9-9, etc.)
  2. Power points -- this will be determined by wins (LL=4 points, L-3 points, M-2 points, S-1 point)
    # points divided by total number of games.
  3. By lot with options -- a) head-to-head; b) most number of wins in the highest classification; c) by lot.
    *Schedules strength of (wins)
    ** Head-to-head
    By lot

  BACK