First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinal | Semifinal | Final | |||||||||||
1 32 |
Sacred Heart Bye |
![]() |
Sacred Heart Cheney Tech |
62 41 |
![]() |
Sacred Heart RHAM |
84 67 |
![]() |
Sacred Heart Trinity Catholic |
56 70 |
![]() |
Trinity Catholic N.W. Catholic |
43 45 |
||
16 17 |
Cheney Tech Goodwin Tech |
61 52 |
|||||||||||||
8 25 |
RHAM Abbott Tech |
97 49 |
![]() |
RHAM Immaculate |
64 50 |
||||||||||
9 24 |
Immaculate Kennedy |
75 40 |
|||||||||||||
4 29 |
Trinity Catholic Wilcox Tech |
83 32 |
![]() |
Trinity Catholic New London |
73 41 |
![]() |
Trinity Catholic Plainfield |
61 54 |
|||||||
13 20 |
New London Joel Barlow |
71 67 |
|||||||||||||
5 28 |
Bullard Havens Plainville |
62 47 |
![]() |
Bullard Havens Plainfield |
46 59 (OT) |
||||||||||
12 21 |
Plainfield Morgan |
56 55 |
|||||||||||||
2 31 |
Kolbe Cathedral Bye |
![]() |
Kolbe Cathedral Haddam-Killingworth |
80 61 |
![]() |
Kolbe Cathedral Suffield |
72 51 |
![]() |
Kolbe Cathedral N.W. Catholic |
63 64 |
|||||
15 18 |
Haddam-Killingworth O'Brien Tech |
50 47 |
|||||||||||||
7 26 |
Suffield Windham Tech |
106 47 |
![]() |
Suffield Prince Tech |
85 54 |
||||||||||
10 23 |
Prince Tech Crosby |
76 65 |
|||||||||||||
3 30 |
Kaynor Tech Bye |
![]() |
Kaynor Tech East Catholic |
48 46 |
![]() |
Kaynor Tech N.W. Catholic |
45 63 |
||||||||
14 19 |
East Catholic New Fairfield |
67 63 |
|||||||||||||
6 27 |
N.W. Catholic Montville |
62 42 |
![]() |
N.W. Catholic Weston |
67 39 |
||||||||||
11 22 |
Weston Platt |
58 42 |
RATINGS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHOOL/TOWN | RATING | PCT | WON | LOST | POWER POINTS/ TIEBREAKER |
Sacred Heart, Waterbury | 1 | 1.000 | 20 | 0 | 3.0 |
Kolbe-Cathedral, Bridgeport | 2 | 1.000 | 20 | 0 | 2.5 |
Kaynor Tech, Waterbury | 3 | 1.000 | 20 | 0 | 2.3 |
Trinity, Stamford | 4 | .950 | 19 | 1 | |
Bullard Havens Tech, Bridgeport | 5 | .900 | 18 | 2 | 2.0 |
N.W. Catholic, W. Hartford | 6 | .900 | 18 | 2 | 1.9 |
Suffield | 7 | .900 | 18 | 2 | 1.45 |
RHAM, Hebron | 8 | .800 | 16 | 4 | |
Immaculate, Danbury | 9 | .750 | 15 | 5 | |
A.I. Prince Tech, Hartford | 10 | .737 | 14 | 5 | |
Weston | 11 | .700 | 14 | 6 | 1.75 |
Plainfield | 12 | .700 | 14 | 6 | 1.35 |
New London | 13 | .684 | 13 | 6 | |
East Catholic, Manchester | 14 | .650 | 13 | 7 | 1.55 |
Haddam-Killingworth, Higganum | 15 | .650 | 13 | 7 | .70 |
Cheney Tech, Manchester | 16 | .600 | 12 | 8 | |
Goodwin Tech, New Britain | 17 | .579 | 11 | 8 | |
O'Brien Tech, Ansonia | 18 | .550 | 11 | 9 | |
New Fairfield | 19 | .500 | 10 | 10 | 1.4 |
Joel Barlow, Redding | 20 | .500 | 10 | 10 | 1.2 |
Morgan, Clinton | 21 | .500 | 10 | 10 | .70 |
Platt, Meriden | 22 | .450 | 9 | 11 | 1.4 |
Crosby, Waterbury | 23 | .450 | 9 | 11 | 1.35 |
Kennedy, Waterbury | 24 | .450 | 9 | 11 | 1.30 |
Abbott Tech, Danbury | 25 | .450 | 9 | 11 | .90 |
Windham Tech | 26 | .450 | 9 | 11 | .75 |
Montville | 27 | .450 | 9 | 11 | .65 |
Plainville | 28 | .400 | 8 | 12 | .75 - 3/L |
Wilcox Tech, Meriden | 29 | .400 | 8 | 12 | 1/L |
Ranking / Seeding (9.0 basketball tournament rules) |
The rating of teams shall be determined by the percentage method: the number of games won divided by the number of games played. Ties in team ratings shall be decided by:
|